As the world becomes more interconnected, sanctions compliance has become a critical element of risk management for companies across all sectors. Yet, as sanctions programs expand and evolve, sanctions evasion tactics are also becoming more sophisticated, and many breaches trace back to a common root cause: weak or ineffective Know Your Customer (KYC) processes.

Simply put, when KYC controls are inadequate, organizations leave the door open to serious violations that can result in fines, reputational damage and even regulatory sanctions of their own.

Why KYC Failures Lead to Sanctions Risk

The goal of a strong KYC program is to verify the true identity of customers, counterparties and beneficial owners. However, when due diligence is superficial or outdated, bad actors can exploit gaps in verification to mask their identities, obscure ownership structures or funnel illicit transactions through otherwise legitimate companies.

Common KYC failures that enable sanctions evasion include:

• Incomplete beneficial ownership verification: Missing hidden relationships that link an entity to a sanctioned individual or company.
• Reliance on outdated public data: Overlooking changes in ownership or control after onboarding.
• Limited screening of related parties: Failing to screen directors, UBOs,and affiliates - not just the main entity.
• Static, one-time KYC reviews: Allowing risks to go undetected as counterparties' circumstances change.

In many high-profile enforcement cases, regulators have pointed directly to poor KYC and Customer Due Diligence (CDD) as enabling factors for sanctions violations.

Evolving Sanctions Evasion Tactics

Sanctions evasion is no longer limited to obvious or direct methods. Today's tactics include:

• Shell companies registered in low-transparency jurisdictions
• Complex ownership structures with multiple layers across countries
• Use of intermediaries or "clean" companies to obscure the true end user
• Changes in beneficial ownership shortly before high-risk transactions
• False declarations and forged documentation

These tactics make it clear that basic KYC is no longer sufficient. Companies must move toward dynamic, risk-based KYC that includes ongoing monitoring, Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) for higher-risk entities, and integration of sanctions screening at every stage of the business relationship.

Building a Stronger Defense Against Sanctions Risk

To mitigate the growing threat of sanctions evasion, organizations should:

• Verify beneficial ownership thoroughly at onboarding and monitor changes over time.
• Screen all related parties, not just the direct counterparty.
• Adopt real-time sanctions screening with automated updates across global lists.
• Implement ongoing KYC refresh cycles based on risk, not just static intervals.
• Invest in technology that centralizes KYC, screening, and monitoring workflows to avoid manual gaps.

Companies that rely only on periodic, manual KYC reviews are increasingly vulnerable. The future of sanctions compliance demands continuous vigilance, risk-based prioritization and smarter, technology-driven KYC processes.

Sanctions programs will only continue to expand. Organizations that strengthen their KYC frameworks now will be better equipped to protect themselves against regulatory penalties and to uphold the trust of their stakeholders.

‍

***************

WANT MORE? SOME RELATED KYC ARTICLES

Why KYC Is No Longer Just for Regulated Companies

Sanctions and tax evasion in Russia/China Copper Trade Scheme‍

KYC in the Era of Global Sanctions: Strategies for product-specific compliance

Regulatory Frameworks + Their Effects on KYC Globally

Uncovering Hidden Sanctions Risks